M&A × Business × Technology
Simulate before you decide.
Every one of these started as a problem I hit at work.
My day job is M&A - valuation, diligence, integration. My habit is building software. So when a deal assumption couldn’t be tested, a system couldn’t be explained, or a task should have taken one minute instead of forty, I built the thing that closed the gap.
Some became products. Some are decision tools. Some are simulations you can play. All of them exist because I needed them first.
How this happens
I noticed
The same frustration came around for a third time.
I dug into the system
The business logic, the data, and what the technology actually allows.
I built it
Small, usable, and shipped.
That order matters. Most tools fail at step two.
Where the disciplines meet
M&A × Finance × Simulation
M&A Synergy Value Creation Simulator
- Problem I saw
- Integration assumptions looked precise in a spreadsheet but rarely admitted how uncertain they actually were.
- What I built
- A Monte Carlo simulator that shows the probability a deal creates value, not just a single NPV number.
M&A × Finance × Learning
Quality of Earnings Explorer
- Problem I saw
- Diligence judgment isn't something you learn from a textbook — it's learned by arguing with adjustments.
- What I built
- A guided, scored simulation that walks through reconciling EBITDA the way a real deal team would.
Engineering × Privacy
LocalPixelBench
- Problem I saw
- Every online image converter caps you at five files and asks you to upload your photos to do it.
- What I built
- A browser-based image toolkit that runs entirely on your device — no uploads, no cap, no account.
Everything I’ve built
If something’s here, I needed it first. If you’re solving something adjacent, I’m interested.
Start a conversation